This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils support for a.out-arm-netbsd target
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: binutils support for a.out-arm-netbsd target
- From: Nick Clifton <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 16:21:35 +0100
- CC: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Thanks for this patch. [Sorry about the delay in responding :-(]
Anyway I have applied the patch, but I would like to make a comment
about the ChangeLog entries that you supplied:
: Index: bfd/ChangeLog
: RCS file: /cvs/binutils/binutils/bfd/ChangeLog,v
: retrieving revision 1.193
: diff -u -b -r1.193 ChangeLog
: --- bfd/ChangeLog 1999/08/19 13:04:45 1.193
: +++ bfd/ChangeLog 1999/08/19 21:52:36
: @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
: +1999-08-19 Roland McGrath <email@example.com>
: + * config.bfd (arm-*-netbsd*): New target.
: + * configure.in (armnetbsd_vec): New target vector.
: + * targets.c (bfd_target_vector): Add &armnetbsd_vec.
: + * Makefile.am (BFD32_BACKENDS): Add armnetbsd.lo.
: + (ALL_MACHINES_CFILES): Add armnetbsd.c.
: + (armnetbsd.lo): New rule with deps.
: 1999-08-19 Nick Clifton <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Firstly, please could you not supply them as context diffs, but just
as straight pieces of ASCII. The ChangeLogs are changing so rapidly
that we are rarely able to apply a context diff without massaging it
first by hand.
Secondly, please could you include *all* of the files that are
affected by your patch in the appropriate ChangeLog entry. For
example in the bfd ChangeLog entry above you omitted the fact that
Makefile.in had been regenerated and that a new file, armnetbsd.c, had
been added to the directory.