Re: [Archer] Stop the Insanity! Linespec Rewrite

[Keith Seitz <keiths at redhat dot com>]

On 03/02/2012 11:06 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> I reviewed the gdb.ada testsuite, and it appears that I failed to
> add a testcase for those. I will put that on my list.

I have a patch to fix this. Thank you for bringing this to my attention 
(and adding tests for it). Your new operator_bps.exp passes 100% on 
archer-keiths-linespec-rewrite. [I haven't pushed the patch yet.]

> I have noticed a few other things:
>
>    . Very minor: We now accept the "task" keyword in any casing (?).
>      So now "break foo TASK 3" is accepted, whereas it wasn't in the past.

I need to audit that. Part of the cleanup phase. Lots to do yet.

>    . Our testsuite spotted a couple of crashes. They might be related
>      to the crash that Tom mentioned, although I kind of doubt it.
>      Nevertheless, I'll investigate them after you've looked at Tom's
>      report, just in case they end up having the same cause.

If you can tell me how to reproduce, I will take a look. There are 
probably lots of gotchas all over the place. I relied heavily (too 
much?) on the test suite. I wonder what bugs Go, D, and other languages 
might expose.

> I'd like to resolve the issues mentioned above before the patch
> actually goes in, [...]

Absolutely. I would not even think of submitting this for official 
review if it had any (real) regressions.

Thank you very much for your help.

Keith