This is the mail archive of the archer@sourceware.org mailing list for the Archer project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Calculating array length

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Joost van der Sluis <joost at cnoc dot nl>
Cc: archer at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:16:43 +0200
Subject: Re: Calculating array length
References: <1244370173.22994.14.camel@wsjoost> <20090607144745.GA21154@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <1244390772.8081.39.camel@wsjoost> <20090607174924.GA4174@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <1244841847.11453.3.camel@wsjoost> <20090615115701.GA12218@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

On Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:57:01 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> I see now that object_address_get_data should be probably just called by
> check_typedef.

Nonsense from me, check_typedef knows only about `struct type *' but
object_address_get_data needs to know the object address (usually from
`struct value *').  Remembered now why there was this complication.

Regards,
Jan

References:
- Calculating array length
  - From: Joost van der Sluis
- Re: Calculating array length
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Calculating array length
  - From: Joost van der Sluis
- Re: Calculating array length
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Calculating array length
  - From: Joost van der Sluis
- Re: Calculating array length
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]