This is the mail archive of the archer@sourceware.org mailing list for the Archer project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Moller <cmoller@redhat.com> writes: >>>>>> > > Chris> From comments during the mtg, I think what I need to do now is > Chris> back off from wedging froggy into gdb for a while and go back > Chris> to working on froggy itself. > > I would recommend trying to get some minimal milestone of gdb/froggy > integration working before putting a whole lot of effort into > upgrading froggy internally. The only things that might be kinda second-tier are the memory access and ubp; I guess I could de-emphasise those two for a while. > Your list looks great in the abstract, > but it isn't clear to me how much of that is really needed for gdb > integration. > > E.g., how bad is the buffering problem really? At the meeting, Jan > suggested that not many events could possibly be buffered, because gdb > will expect a thread to be suspended in response to almost any change. > I'm trying to avoid having froggy turn into a gdb-only thing. Uses such as a froggy-based strace can generate a /bunch/ of events--it was to handle that exact case that I stuck the page-sized ring buffer in the froggy kernel. Chris > Tom > -- Chris Moller I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant. -- Robert McCloskey
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |