This is the mail archive of the
archer@sourceware.org
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: any plans to support gfortran?
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 05:32:36 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:21:57 +0100, Mathew Yeates wrote:
> > > Using gdb for gfortran compiled f90 code kinda sucks.
[...]
> > FWIW, I know Jan has done some work making Fortran support a bit
> > better.
Support for allocated/associated arrays and also referenced strings is
implemented in the Archer branch archer-jankratochvil-vla.
gdb.fortran/dynamic.exp gdb.fortran/string.exp
More correct support for common blocks for `info common' is implemented as
a part of archer-jankratochvil-misc (single commit 8ee641b3).
gdb.fortran/common-block.exp
Currently there is still unimplemented modules importing, tracker at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466118
It should be based on the C++-targeted archer-swagiaal-using-directive branch.
Pointing out any missing Fortran support parts is sure appreciated.
For simplicity all is being merged to: archer-rmoseley-demo-merge
> However, I think that the status was that some patches were submitted
> for Fortran support. I particularly remember one series to help with
> arrays. Unfortunately, they lingered for a while. Eventually, I agreed
> to review them if an updated version was posted. I think one of them
> eventually got checked in. Not sure about the rest.
There were committed two parts but they were only cleaning up the generic code
still whichout any effect on Fortran:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-10/msg00248.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-10/msg00067.html
I will send next part(s) these days, thanks for the review offer.
Regards,
Jan