Bug 6795 - hypot() does not set errno consistently on error
Summary: hypot() does not set errno consistently on error
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: glibc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: math (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Not yet assigned to anyone
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-07-31 09:54 UTC by Michael Kerrisk
Modified: 2014-07-04 05:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Last reconfirmed:
fweimer: security-


Attachments
test program (2.74 KB, text/plain)
2008-07-31 09:56 UTC, Michael Kerrisk
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Kerrisk 2008-07-31 09:54:40 UTC
hypot() raises an exception for underflow and overflow, but only sets errno to
ERANGE for the overflow case.  It should set errno also for the underflow case.

Background: 
On error, many glibc math functions both set errno and raise an exception
(fetestexcept(3)).  For example, the following  function all do this: acos(),
asin(), cosh(), sinh(), acosh(), asinh(), exp(), exp2(), ldexp(), log(),
log10(), log2().  However, there is much inconsistency.  Some functions raise an
exception, but don't set errno.  Some functions set errno for some errors, but
not others.  A few set errno, but don't raise an exception.  This series of bug
reports documents deviations from what I consider the ideal: all functions
should BOTH set errno AND raise an exception for all errors.

All of these reports relate to tests on glibc 2.8 (as provided by SUSE 11.0).
Comment 1 Michael Kerrisk 2008-07-31 09:56:27 UTC
Created attachment 2857 [details]
test program

Sample runs demonstrating the problem:

$ /tmp/mt_hypot dbl_max dbl_max
errno == ERANGE
fetestexcept() says:  FE_OVERFLOW FE_INEXACT
hypot(1.79769313486231571e+308,1.79769313486231571e+308)=inf
ERANGE FE_OVERFLOW +inf

$ /tmp/mt_hypot subnormal:20 subnormal:20
errno == 0
fetestexcept() says:  FE_UNDERFLOW FE_INEXACT
hypot(2.12199579096527232e-314,2.12199579096527232e-314)=3.00095522690537735e-314

0 FE_UNDERFLOW subnormal
Comment 2 Joseph Myers 2012-03-01 02:28:33 UTC
Confirmed with current sources on both x86 and x86_64.
Comment 3 Joseph Myers 2013-11-28 16:58:14 UTC
It's now documented that errno is only intended to be set to ERANGE for underflow to 0, not for underflow to subnormals, and hypot can't underflow to 0.