Bug 2456 - inclusion of urdu locale def
Summary: inclusion of urdu locale def
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: glibc
Classification: Unclassified
Component: localedata (show other bugs)
Version: 2.4
: P2 enhancement
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: GNU C Library Locale Maintainers
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-03-14 07:00 UTC by Lawrence Lim
Modified: 2018-04-19 13:46 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Host:
Target:
Build:
Last reconfirmed:
fweimer: security-

Attachments
Ur-IN locale file (1.78 KB, patch)
2006-07-18 13:21 UTC, Amanpreet Singh Alam 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lawrence Lim 2006-03-14 07:00:00 UTC 
Description of problem:
Urdu (ur_IN) is not supported by the C library. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
glibc-common-2.3.90-38

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.locale -a |grep ur_IN
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Nothing

Expected results:
ur_IN
ur_IN.utf8

Additional Info:
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185375>
Comment 1 Ulrich Drepper 2006-04-25 20:45:06 UTC 
Where is the patch?
Comment 2 Amanpreet Singh Alam 2006-07-18 13:21:40 UTC 
Created attachment 1172 [details]
Ur-IN locale file

there may be some warning message, please try to fix
I made from ur_PK file
Comment 3 Ulrich Drepper 2006-08-12 20:27:08 UTC 
This file is bogus.  You should never duplicate information.  For instance, the
LC_CTYPE data is identical to the ur_PK data.  Therefore copy should be used. 
The LC_MONETARY section is identical to the ur_PK locale, too, and here it makes
no sense at all.  E.g., the currency sign must be that of India and not Pakistan.

I can only assume you haven't looked at the data at all.  Fix it, reduce
duplication to a mimimum.
Comment 4 Ulrich Drepper 2007-02-17 18:15:26 UTC 
No reply after 6 months, closing.