Thank you for submitting an updated locale. It appears that you have forgotten to remove a part of the LC_CTYPE section? Also, in most cases, you change the locale to copy data from es_ES, but in the LC_MESSAGES, you do the opposite and instead copy-paste the es_ES.LC_MESSAGES - was that intentional?

(In reply to comment #1)
> Thank you for submitting an updated locale. It appears that you have forgotten
> to remove a part of the LC_CTYPE section? Also, in most cases, you change the
> locale to copy data from es_ES, but in the LC_MESSAGES, you do the opposite and
> instead copy-paste the es_ES.LC_MESSAGES - was that intentional?

Petr Baudis: Best regards, do not really understand that you meant the party was to delete the LC_CTYPE, to make sure I have been reviewing it in other local es_ES derived and all values ​​are equal, if you kindly explained best I would appreciate, excuse my stupidity but I am not clear.

By that, I meant the lines

translit_start                                         
include "translit_combining";""
translit_end               
END LC_CTYPE

Created attachment 6436 [details]
this is the fixed cuban locale updated

I'm Sorry, in the last revision i've forgot to delete the following lines:
translit_start
include "translit_combining" ""
translit_end
END LC_CTYPE
Thanks Paul for your help, this is what excites me about the free software fun and easy collaboration between the community.

Ok, but I still do not understand your LC_TIME and LC_MESSAGES change. Also, you changed the LC_IDENTIFICATION.address, is that correct?

(In reply to comment #5)

Yes, it's correct

Ok, but I still do not understand your LC_TIME and LC_MESSAGES change.